US Lawyer and activist, Wesley Smith exposes what the recent Dutch figures really say. See also earlier post from . If euthanasia & assisted suicide are a public good, why don't they simply tell it like it
But the doctor killing count in the Netherlands is actually far higher. Terminal sedation is slow motion euthanasia. In TS, the patient is put into a coma and deprived of food and water until death. (This should be distinguished from palliative sedation, a legitimate pain control technique, as I write about here). According to a Lancetreport, 12.3% of Dutch deaths involved continual sedation:
Peter Saundersreally is?
I grow weary of the continual attempts to spin and cover up the depth of the death culture of the Netherlands. For example, recently, articles have celebrated the official 2.8% euthanasia rate. But that doesn't include assisted suicide (0.2) and the fact that 23% of euthanasia deaths are unreported. So, that brings the official count to about 3.5%.
In and of itself, that's huge. In the USA, it would amount to about 84,000 euthanasia/assisted suicides a year (3.5% of 2.4 million annual deaths)!
But the doctor killing count in the Netherlands is actually far higher. Terminal sedation is slow motion euthanasia. In TS, the patient is put into a coma and deprived of food and water until death. (This should be distinguished from palliative sedation, a legitimate pain control technique, as I write about here). According to a Lancetreport, 12.3% of Dutch deaths involved continual sedation:
In 2010, of all deaths in the Netherlands, 2·8% (95% CI 2·5–3·2; 475 of 6861) were the result of euthanasia…In 2010, 77% (3136 of 4050) of all cases of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide were reported to a review committee (80% in 2005). Ending of life without an explicit patient request in 2010 occurred less often (0·2%; 95% CI 0·1–0·3; 13 of 6861)… Continuous deep sedation until death occurred more frequently in 2010 (12·3% )…Of all deaths in 2010, 0·4% (0·3–0·6; 18 of 6861) were the result of the patient's decision to stop eating and drinking to end life; in half of these cases the patient had made a euthanasia request that was not granted.
My research indicates that about 2% of terminal cases require palliative sedation, which is not killing because it is done at the very end of life and death comes from the disease, not dehydration. Using that figure, about 10% of Dutch deaths were TS slow motion euthanasia. That raises the killing count to nearly 14%.
Now, realize that roughly half of Dutch deaths do not involve end of life medical decision making (e.g. accidents, heart attack, etc.). That makes the count–(very roughly)–25-28% of all deaths in which medical decisions were made about the end of life. (And we are not even discussing intentional morphine overdoses that previous studies show usually go unreported).
Now, I think we are on much more realistic ground. The 2.8% stat is clearly bogus. The real number is at least 3.5%, but really closer to 14%. If the USA legalized euthanasia and had a similar killing count, the total number of doctor-administered deaths would be over 300,000 annually!
LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith, J.D., is a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture. He writes at his blog, Secondhand Smoke.
Do you like this post?