There has been a refreshing change in our public discourse in the past few weeks. In the wake of the devastating global pandemic gripping the whole world, and in the midst of incredible upheaval and suffering, we have collectively shifted our focus to the protection and care for the vulnerable, elderly and health impaired members of our communities in ways that have been not hitherto apparent or at the forefront of government policy. Continue reading

The horrors of the COVID-19 virus has exposed the effect on the availability of health care in jurisdictions that have legalised euthanasia and assisted suicide. Continue reading

  “However harsh: euthanasia care cannot be identified as a top priority in health care.” Continue reading

  atistics released in Belgium show another increase in people being put to death under that country’s regime.   Continue reading

In a recent article, researcher Danielle van Dalen highlighted the dangers inherent in assisted suicide legislation when it comes to unintended negative inferences conveyed by such laws in relation to certain groups in our communities: Continue reading

The latest report from Oregon in relation to its assisted suicide regime reported record deaths last year.  Continue reading

“It is not obvious that the current safeguards are working.” Continue reading

Manon wanted help. Continue reading

‘Slippery slope’ has always been a controversial term in the euthanasia debate. Pro-euthanasia advocates use all kinds of contorted definitions and revisions of history to deny that there is any kind of slippery slope when it comes to euthanasia legislation, despite the lived experience of countries like Belgium and the Netherlands. Continue reading

“How much more money are we going to spend on him keeping him alive?” Continue reading